- Client
- Northstar (anonymized)
- What was the problem?
- Carriers want AI to triage claims, but a wrong payout or a missed fraud signal creates real liability. Adjusters needed the AI to do the routine work without losing control of the money.
- Why did it matter?
- Routine claims take most of an adjuster’s day, and every payout carries financial and regulatory weight. Speed without control is not an option in a regulated business.
- What research was done?
- Secondary research across 8 sources on human-in-the-loop AI and claims, an audit of approval and escalation patterns, stakeholder mapping, and assumption-based personas that are not yet validated in interviews.
- What constraints existed?
- A licensed adjuster must approve every payout. The AI’s reasoning has to be inspectable, and every step needs a permanent record for compliance and disputes.
- What decisions did I make?
- I chose an AI workflow, not an agent: the same seven steps for every claim, with fixed routing rules (below 70% confidence goes to a specialist). The queue puts the lowest confidence first, and edits happen in place with a required reason.
- How did engineering shape it?
- I designed for how claims systems are built. The AI only stages a proposal, and a human approval is the only thing that can release a payment. Every number traces back to a policy clause or a document, and every step writes to the audit log.
- What changed after launch?
- It has not launched. It is a concept with a clickable prototype. Next, I would test the review card with adjusters and measure time to decision, edit and override rates, escalations and audit-ready claims.